Data Quality and Governance for Accurate AI Descriptions

Clean publicly available data is the fastest way to cut AI mistakes about your brand.

---

AI answers don’t make things up out of nowhere. They stitch together what they can source and read. When your public digitally published pages disagree, the stitch shows.

Your brand will get described by these AI systems either way. The main lever you control is to keep public facts consistent everywhere they appear digitally for your brand.

Accurate AI descriptions come from correct, consistent, well-owned data across your public digital footprint.

Where Models Pull Your Data

Most mid-market brands show up through six (6) sources:

1. Your website and landing pages
   What you do, who you serve, packaging, pricing language.

2. Docs and your help center
   Steps, limits, prerequisites, “what it does not do.” These often read as the most credible sources because they’re operational in nature.

3. Structured data, feeds, catalogs
   Product attributes that flow through PIM/MDM workflows and into other sites.

4. Partner and distributor listings
   Often distributor lists outrank you on niche queries. If these drift, the answer drifts.

5. Reviews, directories, analyst write-ups
   Earned sources shape category summaries. One comparative study reports many AI search systems weight earned sources more than brand-owned sources. (Source)

6. Filings, policies, press coverage
   Compliance, warranties, refunds, and policy language can stick around for years.

AI systems also differ in how they point back to sources. ChatGPT Search describes answering with links. (Source) Perplexity describes numbered citations. (Source) If your public facts conflict, your answer summary layer from AI search will conflict too.

---

---

Where the “Conflicting” Answers Come From

Most “hallucinations about brands” trace back to a few boring problems:

1. Same fact, different values

• 99.9% uptime on one page, 99.5% elsewhere

• “SOC 2 certified” in marketing, “SOC 2 Type II in progress” on security pages

• “2 weeks to implement” on a blog, “8 weeks” in your onboarding docs

1. Old pages still showing up for your brand
   Legacy PDFs, expired press releases, dead pricing pages, old release notes.

2. Name drift across your products
   Multiple names for the same product, inconsistent SKUs, changing feature terms.

3. Missing limits and boundaries
   Summaries compress nuance. If your content doesn’t spell out constraints, models fill the gap.

4. Partner copy-paste issues when displaying your products
   Resellers clone older specs and keep them live on their site.

5. Marketing claims without proof
   This can become legal risk fast. The FTC’s August 2025 action against Air AI focused on alleged deceptive claims about business growth, earnings, and guarantees. (Source)

6. Clear labeling rules are tightening
   In December 2025, the European Commission published a draft Code of Practice on marking and labelling AI-generated content and said the related rules apply on August 2, 2026. (Source)

Governance that Improves Accuracy

This is where a Head of Data / Analytics can be part of your growth team by keeping  your public facts stable across your digital footprint.

Build a small “public facts” catalog

Treat a short list of public claims like master data, even if you don’t run full MDM.

IBM describes MDM as unifying core records into one source of truth, and its December 2025 announcement points to matching and data quality monitoring. (Source) ISG’s 2025 MDM Buyers Guide frames MDM as one version of the truth to improve accuracy and consistency. (Source)

You can use the same pattern without enterprise tooling:

• Pick the facts that matter

• Assign owners inside your organization

• Define approved values (plus your scope language)

• Tie those values to the pages and feeds people see

• Control changes

Template: Public Facts Register

Fact	Approved Value	Scope/Limites	Source System	Canonical Public URL	Owner	Approver	Last Checked	Next Review	Notes
Pricing Model	[Value]	Applies to [segment]	Billing/Finance	/pricing	Finance	Legal + CMO	[Date]	[Date]	Link to terms
Compliance status	[Value]	Region-specific	GRC	/security	Security	Legal	[Date]	[Date]	Proof Link
Uptime target	[Value]	Excludes planned maintenance	Ops	/uptime	Engineering	Legal	[Date]	[Date]	SLA match
Implementation timeline	[Value]	Depends on [inputs]	PMO	/implementation	Services	CMO	[Date]	[Date]	Prereqs listed
Data retention	[Value]	By plan	Product	/security	Security	Legal	[Date]	[Date]	Subprocessor link
Product name/SKU	[Value]	Aliases allowed	PIM/ERP	/product/x	Product	PMM	[Date]	[Date]	Distributor mapping

Rule: if a fact is in the register, it should not vary across public surfaces.

Put change control into your workflow in 2026

Three pieces help stay on the path:

1. Change triggers
   Pricing, packaging, security/compliance, policy language, regulated claims.

2. Approval lanes
   Owner proposes → Legal checks risk/wording for high-stakes facts → Marketing places and links → Web team updates canonical pages and retires old ones.

3. Audit trail
   Dynatrace argues for auditability and traceability in AI services. (Source) Your mission is a clear record of what changed, when, and who signed off.

MarketingOps defines marketing data governance as rules, roles, and processes that keep data accurate and consistent. (Source) Apply this discipline to your public facing facts.

Connect Internal Brand Truth to Public Website Pages

You want updates to flow out fast, without letting facts drift over time.

1. Pick your top 20 public facts
   Identify things buyers and partners repeat such pricing rules, compliance scope, uptime/SLA wording, timelines, compatibility, warranties/refunds, safety limits.

2. Give each fact one home page
   One place people can point to, and other pages will link to.

3. Match machine readable data to the visible page
   Don’t publish a feed value that contradicts the page copy.

4. Remove conflicts, not just typos
   Redirect old pages, pull outdated PDFs from indexable folders, add “superseded by” notes on legacy docs, produce and publish one distributor data pack.

5. Run a quarterly public footprint audit
   Pick the ~50 pages that matter (product, docs, pricing, policies, security, integrations, top partner pages) and check the following:

• consistency vs the register

• dates and owners

• missing limits and conflicting claims

Example: Fix a Compliance Claim Conflict

Problem: A sales page says, “SOC 2 certified.” The security page says, “SOC 2 Type II in progress.” A distributor repeats “SOC 2 certified.”

Fix (in order,1-6):

1. Update the public facts register with the approved compliance statement and scope language.

2. Update the security hub and link to proof.

3. Update marketing pages to link to the hub instead of restating the claim.

4. Update the distributor data pack with the same statement.

5. Redirect or retire legacy pages with the old claim.

6. Add a monthly review for compliance facts.

This prevents the same break from coming back.

---

---

What to Measure so Your Process Stays Tied to Outcomes

AI answer quality (sampled)

• Accuracy score (0–3) for 25 priority questions

• “Cites our canonical page” rate on those questions

1. Brand safety / exposure 

• High-stakes misstatements found per month

• Time to correction for Tier 1 facts (pricing, security, safety)

1. Sales impact

• Less repeat-question friction in sales cycles ([Internal metric])

• More visits to proof pages from high-intent entry pages

1. Support impact

• Fewer support tickets tied to top issues after your doc updates

• Higher self-serve success on troubleshooting flows ([Internal metric])

---

What You can Now in 2026

Create a public facts inventory for your top 20 data points, then make every public facing digital mention match it.

A 30-day push:

1. Build your register

2. Assign owners + approval lanes (Data + Legal + Marketing)

3. Map each fact to one, source of truth, canonical public web page

4. Remove or retire conflicting sources

5. Set a quarterly public, digital footprint audit

Accurate AI system and summary descriptions come from clean, consistent data across everything that can read about your brand, company and products in 2026.

---

Last updated 01-19-2026