Building an AI Search Tiger Team in a Mid-Market Organization
How VP Growth leaders deliver GEO outcomes without turning it into a committee
Executive Summary
GEO work stalls in mid-market companies for one reason: it pulls in too many teams. Content needs new page patterns. Web needs template and indexing changes. Product marketing needs tighter entity and product claim language. Sales wants proof pages. Legal worries about what you can say. Data wants clean measurement. Everyone nods. No one runs the whole thing.
A tiger team fixes that. It’s a small cross-functional group with decision rights, a fixed window of time, and a backlog that gets finished. Use it to run tight tests, turn what works into standards, and get the rest of the org using them.
A focused tiger team speeds up GEO progress and keeps cross-functional work moving.
Why a Tiger Team Works for GEO
GEO and AEO change how discovery works for your brand. AI assistants synthesize answers and cite sources:
ChatGPT Search (Source)
Perplexity Citations (Source)
Google AI features (AI Overviews / AI Mode): (Source)
So, this is no longer “just SEO.” It’s a coordinated marketing system across:
content (answer units, proof pages, category narratives)
web (templates, performance, indexing rules)
data (visibility checks, conversion and pipeline signals, test design)
product / PMM (entities, claims, packaging clarity)
legal / security (risk lanes for regulated or sensitive topics)
sales / CS (real buyer questions and objections)
This work has a learning curve. You need faster feedback loops:
run small experiments
check AI visibility and on-site behavior
codify what works
roll it out inside a defined scope
Without a tiger team, mid-market orgs usually do the opposite and stall out in endless debate, scattered fixes, fuzzy measurement, then momentum dies quietly.
Define Your Team Charter
A tiger team without a charter turns into a task force, then a recurring meeting. Write down the goal and give it a time window for your team.
Charter Template
Mission: Build repeatable GEO and AEO capability that improves AI search discovery and conversion for [Product/Category].
Time window: 6 months (fixed).
Scope: One product line or one category hub + its top 20–40 pages.
Success metrics (90-day leading / 180-day lagging):
Leading: AI presence rate on priority query set, citation-to-canonical rate, proof-page consumption rate
Lagging: organic conversion rate, pipeline influenced, reduced sales friction on top objections ([Internal metric])
Deliverables:
“Reference object” content standard + templates
Technical baseline (indexing rules, performance guardrails, schema where appropriate)
Measurement scoreboard + review cadence
Rules for claims and updates
End state: Tiger team folds into a standard operating model owned by [function].
Scope rule that keeps this in-check and doable:
Don’t start with “the entire website.” Pick one lane you and your team can win, then expand.
Roles and Responsibilities
This works when the team is small, senior enough to decide, and close enough to execution to get work live.
Recommended team size (7 people)
Core (5)
Tiger Team Lead (VP Growth sponsor or Program Lead)
Owns outcomes, keeps pace, breaks ties.SEO / AI Search Strategy Lead
Owns the query set, content rules, visibility checks.Content Lead (editorial + IA)
Owns templates, rewrites, refresh rules, and the “reference object” pattern.Web Engineering Manager / Tech Lead
Owns templates, technical fixes, performance guardrails, indexing rules.Analytics / Experimentation Lead
Owns dashboards, event tracking, and test design.
Rotate team members in as needed:
Product Marketing (entities + claims)
Owns definitions, packaging clarity, “what we do and don’t do.”
Legal / Compliance
Reviews higher-risk claims and regulated topics.Security (trust pages)
Owns accuracy and review cadence for security content.
Sales / CS rep
Brings buyer questions; checks whether pages help in real deals.
| Workstream | Responsibility | Accountable | Consulted | Informed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Query set + AI visibility checks | SEO Lead | Program Lead | Content Analytics |
Exec Sponsor |
| Templates + rewrites | Content Lead | Program Lead | PMM Sales/CS |
Marketing |
| Technical changes (templates, CWV, index rules) |
Web Eng | Web Eng | SEO Analytics |
Program Lead |
| Dashboard + events | Analytics | Analytics | SEO Web Eng |
Program Lead |
| Claim rules (regulated content) | Legal/Compliance | Legal/Compliance | PMM Security |
Program Lead |
| Proof surfaces (security, implementation, pricing) | PMM + Web Eng | Program Lead | Security Sales |
Marketing |
| Quarterly narrative review | Program Lead | VP Growth | SEO PMM Sales |
Exec Team |
Rule: one accountable person per workstream. Never “the team.”
Operating Rhythm and Decision Rights
Most tiger teams fail because cadence is vague and decisions get re-litigated. Run your team and deliverables like a product sprint.
Weekly Rhythm
Monday (30 min): plan
pick 3 ready items
confirm owners
define “done”
Midweek (async): unblock
blockers posted in a shared channel
engineering or legal escalations flagged immediately
Friday (45 min): demo + decisions
show what went live (pages, templates, dashboards)
review leading indicators
decide: expand, revise, or stop
Monthly rhythm (exec-facing)
Monthly GEO scorecard (30 min)
AI presence rate on priority queries (directional)
citation-to-canonical rate
proof-page consumption (security, implementation, comparisons)
organic conversion rate and pipeline signals
Visibility isn’t the goal. Revenue and reduced deal friction are.
Decision rights (write them down)
Tiger team decides
template standards and which pages get rewritten first
internal linking rules inside the chosen scope
which measurement events get added
rules for public vs noindex vs gated for the scoped content
Escalate to exec sponsor
major navigation redesign
pricing claims, compliance, or security assertions
large engineering lifts competing with the roadmap
brand positioning shifts
48-hour rule
If a blocker isn’t cleared in 48 hours, escalate. Pace is the point.
Moving from Your Tiger Team to Lasting Capability
A tiger team is a change vehicle, not a permanent org chart box.
By month six, you should have
A repeatable playbook
“reference object” page template
vertical Q&A patterns
proof page standards
rules for claims and updates
A measurement system that keeps running
AI referral grouping where measurable
on-site behavior metrics
monthly scorecard cadence
Clear owners after the team ends
Content team: templates + refresh cadence
Web team: technical guardrails + release QA
SEO / AI search lead: query sets + competitive monitoring
Legal / security: claim review lanes
Sunsetting Criteria
End your tiger team when:
core templates exist and teams use them across the scoped area
measurement is live and reviewed monthly
at least 2 to 3 test cycles have run (learned, applied, repeated)
the remaining backlog can be handled inside normal functions without escalation
After that, move from “tiger team” to a normal marketing operating system.
Your Sample 6-month Plan to Get Moving
Months 1–2: foundation + first wins
build the priority query set for one product line
publish content templates (answer block, definition, troubleshooting, proof links)
fix top technical blockers in scope (indexing mistakes, broken canonicals, slow templates)
launch a dashboard with leading indicators
Months 3–4: scale inside the lane
rewrite the top 20 pages into reference objects
publish 3 proof surfaces (security, implementation, comparison)
run 2 controlled tests (structure, entity clarity, internal linking)
Months 5–6: embed and expand
document rules and refresh cadence
train internal teams on the template approach
expand to the next product line or vertical lane
fold the tiger team into standard team responsibilities
Your Next Steps to Get the Ball Rolling in 2026
Charter a 6-month GEO tiger team with:
one product or category scope
3–5 measurable outcomes
a weekly sprint cadence with clear decision rights
a defined end state and sunset criteria
Skip the big reorg. Start with a small team that publishes changes weekly, measures results, and turns what works into standards other teams can follow.
Last updated 01-20-2026